NUUT.co: Some Perspective.

kevinnuut:

Wasn’t it just a few months ago that Tumblr was telling us to protest censorship from bills like SOPA and PIPA, then they go about proposing their own forms of censorship when it comes to individuals who express interest in body harm and mutilation?

No censorship means no censorship. It…

36 Notes/ Hide

  1. riser reblogged this from namelessted and added:
    Ted nails it. People that confuse censorship with a private company’s terms of service is a REAL BIG pet-peeve of mine....
  2. namelessted reblogged this from kevinnuut and added:
    Note from Ted: No censorship doesn’t mean no censorship. Censorship coming from a private company is completely...
  3. my-fight reblogged this from kevinnuut and added:
    pro-ED blogs. Thy make me feel miserable. The aim...be to further isolate those who are...
  4. tomorrowstea reblogged this from kevinnuut
  5. keepbreathingplease reblogged this from kevinnuut
  6. thataccountiabandoned reblogged this from cruisecontrolforcool
  7. derekreynolds reblogged this from kevinnuut
  8. littlelovebites reblogged this from kevinnuut and added:
    companies should be able...want to allow on...sites...
  9. thatfrenchman reblogged this from kevinnuut and added:
    I agree. The argument can be made...is a private company
  10. mithical reblogged this from kevinnuut and added:
    Here’s my take: Blogs promoting bulimia, anorexia and self-harm are horrible, but I’ve come to understand
  11. cruisecontrolforcool reblogged this from kevinnuut and added:
    private organization private organization can say “we do not support...will not host...
  12. colormenaive said: i don’t really know how i feel about this. it’s a fine line.
  13. env0 said: I went and read the …’censoring’ of self harm. … Its more so the concern for those who do cut, or self mutilate, or consider suicide, or have eating disorders. Tumblr is attempting to provide resources in a positive manner for people.
  14. kevinnuut posted this